高级检索

    电化学手持仪与气相色谱在土壤天然氢气检测中的对比及偏差校正

    Comparison and deviation correction between electrochemical handheld detector and gas chromatography in soil natural hydrogen detection

    • 摘要: 天然氢作为一种新兴清洁能源,其地表渗漏检测结果的可靠性直接影响资源评价与勘探部署的科学性。针对电化学原理的手持式氢气检测仪在天然氢土壤气调查中存在的测值代表性不足、动态响应规律不清以及定量校验依据薄弱等问题,构建了基于电化学与色谱检测的协同验证体系,并结合参考气体实验与现场采样对比,对仪器响应过程、阶段性偏差特征及采样时机优化方法进行了系统研究。结果表明,GA5000手持式检测仪的响应过程可划分为初始快速响应阶段、过渡阶段和稳定阶段,且具有明显的浓度依赖性。低浓度条件下,达到稳定状态所需时间超过115 s,稳定值相对于色谱值的偏差最大可达-68.8%;高浓度条件下,稳定时间缩短至约100 s,偏差显著减小并趋近于零。现场采样结果显示,氢气浓度变化方向对两类仪器测值差异具有决定性影响:在浓度上升阶段,色谱实测值普遍高于手持仪同步读数,最大正偏差为58.9%;在浓度下降阶段,色谱实测值显著低于手持仪读数,最大负偏差为218.2%。上述现象表明,手持仪在浓度上升过程中主要受响应滞后控制,在浓度下降过程中则明显受记忆效应影响。基于此,提出了分阶段采样优化策略,即在上升阶段优先实施瞬时采样,以降低响应延迟对判识高值的干扰;在下降阶段宜选择浓度相对稳定时段采样,以削弱记忆效应造成的高估。在此基础上,进一步提出同步比对与局部校正相结合的协同校准方法,形成了由野外快速筛查、阶段识别、样品采集到色谱精确定量的技术链条,为天然氢地表检测方法的规范化与标准化提供了技术支撑。

       

      Abstract: As an emerging clean energy resource, natural hydrogen requires reliable surface seepage detection, which directly affects the scientific validity of resource evaluation and exploration deployment. To address the inadequate representativeness of measured values, the poorly understood dynamic response characteristics, and the weak basis for quantitative calibration encountered with electrochemical handheld hydrogen detectors in natural hydrogen soil-gas surveys, a collaborative verification system based on electrochemical and chromatographic detection was established. Through reference gas experiments and field comparative sampling, the dynamic response process, stage-dependent bias characteristics, and sampling timing optimization strategy were systematically investigated. The results show that the response of the GA5000 can be divided into an initial rapid-response stage, a transitional stage, and a stable stage, with a clear concentration dependence. Under low-concentration conditions, more than 115 s was required to reach a stable state, and the deviation between the stabilized reading and the chromatographic value reached -68.8%. Under high-concentration conditions, the stabilization time was shortened to about 100 s, and the deviation decreased markedly to nearly zero. Field results further show that the direction of concentration change exerts a controlling influence on the discrepancy between the two instruments. During the rising stage, chromatographic values were generally higher than the synchronous handheld readings, with a maximum positive deviation of 58.9%. During the declining stage, chromatographic values were significantly lower than the handheld readings, with a maximum negative deviation of 218.2%. These results indicate that response lag dominates the bias during concentration increase, whereas memory effect becomes the main source of error during concentration decrease. Accordingly, a stage-specific sampling strategy is proposed: instantaneous sampling is preferred during the rising stage to reduce the influence of response delay on the identification of high-concentration values, whereas sampling during relatively stable intervals is recommended during the declining stage to mitigate overestimation caused by memory effect. On this basis, a collaborative calibration approach combining synchronous comparison with local correction was developed, establishing a technical chain from rapid field screening to accurate chromatographic quantification. The study provides technical support for the normalization and standardization of natural hydrogen surface detection methods.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回